Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
TMA - Temporary Board
 
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Poll Poll
Question: Which is the better Arkham game?

Arkham Asylum    
  2 (40.0%)
Arkham City    
  3 (60.0%)




Total votes: 5
« Created by: MoshTMA on: 04/30/13 at 01:40:36 »

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Arkham Asylum vs. Arkham City (Read 3236 times)
MoshTMA
Admin
*****
Offline



Posts: 972
Gender: male
Arkham Asylum vs. Arkham City
04/30/13 at 01:40:36
 
Because Arkham Origins is due out later this year, I've revisited the Arkhamverse in anticipation, but it's kind of hard to say which is the better game, so I'm curious to see what others think.

Is it the atmosphere rich Asylum?
...
Or the more action oriented City?
...
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Astro-Creep 95
Champion Bullfighter
**
Offline



Posts: 20
Gender: male
Re: Arkham Asylum vs. Arkham City
Reply #1 - 04/30/13 at 05:01:52
 
I would say Asylum by a hair. While City has the better gameplay, Asylum has the better story and atmosphere. While they're both top-notch games, I find myself replaying Asylum more than I do City, and for that reason I vote Asylum.

On a related note, I'm worried about how Origins wil stand up to Asylum and City. This will be the first Arkham game without Rocksteady, Dini, Conroy or Hamill.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
j0k3r428
Certified Astronaut
***
Offline


Shutup Baby I Know It

Posts: 37
NJ
Gender: male
Re: Arkham Asylum vs. Arkham City
Reply #2 - 04/30/13 at 08:13:25
 
Huge Batman fan, if my name wasn't a dead giveaway, but will have to say Arkham City.  I went back through the games about 2 months ago to get my Plats and City is just the better developed game.  The only negative I hear from my friends is how lost and overwhelmed they are in Arkham City as opposed to Asylum, due to the huge amount of side quests.  The biggest thing I noticed about the two though were the differences in sound quality, you can really tell how much more work they put into City's score this time around.  The tweaks to the Riddler quest was refreshing and being able to fly the whole city was just badass.  The only thing I really missed from Asylum was Scarecrow Sad , his fights were awesome.  Difficulty wise, Asylum takes the cake with the Shock and Awe Extreme challenge -_-   .....never again.  I am a little nervous about the new game but also really excited.  I still get the gamestop magazine which came with an editorial about it and seeing Black Mask and Deathstroke in the spotlight this time around feels fresh.  Still waiting for gameplay but will probably be a definite buy for me.

How bout yourself Mosh?
Back to top
 

"In my dream, the world had suffered a terrible disaster. A black haze shut out the sun, and the darkness was alive with the moans and screams of wounded people. Suddenly, a small light glowed. A candle flickered into life, symbol of hope for millions. A single tiny candle, shining in the ugly dark. I laughed and blew it out."
 
IP Logged
 
MoshTMA
Admin
*****
Offline



Posts: 972
Gender: male
Re: Arkham Asylum vs. Arkham City
Reply #3 - 04/30/13 at 18:47:52
 
This was an extremely close call.

I'd say Arkham City by a hair. I do think Arkham Asylum has the better atmosphere and a less convoluted story, even though AC had the better ending, but City improved the gameplay by a lot by adding gliding, extra weapons, sliding, improving detective mode, and enhancing the riddler challenge. The only thing lacking in AC was the Scarecrow hallucinations. Although there were times where Batman would hallucinate in AC it wasn't as amazing as it was with the Scarecrow nightmares. AA was a more psychological game, and the interview tapes were better in Asylum also. Arkham City managed to improve upon just about everything else. The Challenge Rooms in AC was an improvement as well, especially with the inclusion of Robin, Nightwing, Catwoman, and all the alternate costumes. Arkham Asylum did have a playable Joker mode though (at least for PS3). So yeah, I vote for AC but it only wins by a hair, mostly because I like how the gameplay evolved.

I am worried for Arkham Origins as much as I anticipate it. It is indeed a new developer and there will be no Conroy, Hamill, or Dini. The lack of Dini worries me the most. The new developer kind of worries but at least they'll be using basically the same gameplay engine that Rocksteady used. The lack of Conroy is because they want a younger sounding Batman. The lack of Dini is unacceptable though. Arkham Origins may end up with a shit story due to that, but I hope I'm wrong. What I know about the story so far isn't very Arkham-ish as it involves 8 assassins, including Deathstroke, being hired by the crime boss, Black Mask, to eliminate Batman and it takes place in a snowy Gotham City kind of like AC except it wont be a big prison. I don't expect the atmosphere to be as surreal, but I wont doubt Warner Bros. Montreal will try their best to scare the player by making the villains ultra violent. I certainly don't expect Origins to be better than City or Asylum. I just hope it's at least more enjoyable than "The Dark Knight Rises" in terms of story, and that the game-play isn't too stripped down since it's a prequel taking place during Batman's 2nd year as a vigilante, before he was as refined.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print